Everything is wrong in this photo, her Glamorous side is actually kind of a pretty face [but nothing more], but the body is all wrong and the side effect side is just She should have been in the bottom 2 with Janet, with Janet leaving.
^Janet is 5'8, has great athletic body but is too big for fashion, has a very prominent nose and her face is the definition of pretty, pedestrian girl.
^I thought that Saleisha had a ton of commercial potential and Mila's face was gorgeous, I didn't think Janet's picture was anything special TBH and she had the least potential out of all the girls. I could only see her in mainstream commercial and catalogue work.
[Jul 22, 2009 at 02:58 PM]
^I think Janet's pictures are stellar but you have a point with her lack of potential.
![[ANTM]_Bianca04.jpg](albums/userpics/10001/thumb_%5BANTM%5D_Bianca04.jpg "Filename=[ANTM]_Bianca04.jpg
Filesize=22KiB
Dimensions=429x370
Date added=Apr 14, 2008")
![[ANTM]_Bianca03_(Matthew_Jordan_Smith).jpg](albums/userpics/10001/thumb_%5BANTM%5D_Bianca03_%28Matthew_Jordan_Smith%29.jpg "Filename=[ANTM]_Bianca03_(Matthew_Jordan_Smith).jpg
Filesize=739KiB
Dimensions=1500x2000
Date added=Apr 14, 2008")
![[ANTM]_Bianca02_(Mike_Rosenthal).jpg](albums/userpics/10001/thumb_%5BANTM%5D_Bianca02_%28Mike_Rosenthal%29.jpg "Filename=[ANTM]_Bianca02_(Mike_Rosenthal).jpg
Filesize=775KiB
Dimensions=2000x1500
Date added=Apr 14, 2008")
![[ANTM]_Bianca01b.jpg](albums/userpics/10001/thumb_%5BANTM%5D_Bianca01b.jpg "Filename=[ANTM]_Bianca01b.jpg
Filesize=25KiB
Dimensions=500x333
Date added=Apr 14, 2008")
![[ANTM]_Bianca01a.jpg](albums/userpics/10001/thumb_%5BANTM%5D_Bianca01a.jpg "Filename=[ANTM]_Bianca01a.jpg
Filesize=26KiB
Dimensions=500x333
Date added=Apr 14, 2008")
She should have been in the bottom 2 with Janet, with Janet leaving.
EEEWWW looks bad in both takes