All ANTM

Photos of every ANTM contestant!
Home > Cycle 6 > Mollie Sue Steenis-Gondi > Miscellaneous Photos
Mollie Sue Steenis-Gondi
Photo: Peter Koval

Mollie Sue Steenis-Gondi

Photo: Peter Koval

MollieSue125.jpg MollieSue126.jpg MollieSue128.jpg MollieSue141.jpg MollieSue143.jpg

Comment 1 to 20 of 35
Page: 1 - 2

ChartreusePony   [May 23, 2008 at 08:34 PM]
I love the body in this shot but there's something missing from her face. It seems to lack desire and passion.
AngelManos205   [Jul 05, 2008 at 09:47 PM]
That would be a great shot for a topic about War's affects!!!
david18   [Oct 23, 2008 at 02:39 AM]
the toning and expression is absolutely exquisite!
Sophie   [Oct 23, 2008 at 09:17 AM]
I actually adore the face. To bits! It's very haunting and moody. Very 'Salem's Lot, imo.
Solitaire   [Nov 20, 2008 at 08:29 AM]
LOVE her face, love the light, love the idea, just wish her hips were a tiny bit smaller, but as far as shes conserened, shes working it!
david18   [Dec 03, 2008 at 04:50 AM]
this photo makes me INSANE IN THE MEMBRANE!!!!!! *O*
Jesse_Dillon   [Jan 26, 2009 at 11:35 PM]
EWWWWW What is up with her torso and hips?!!?!? that is discustinggg!
david18   [Jan 26, 2009 at 11:56 PM]
Only Mollie could make "disgusting" fiahce.
Jesse_Dillon   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:06 AM]
But for real, what is wrong wit hher in this pic?
david18   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:10 AM]
They're called hips, jesse. Something I'd expect you to know about.
Jesse_Dillon   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:18 AM]
Then its her torso that looks nastyy
david18   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:26 AM]
Those are toned abs, jesse. Signs of going to the gym.
Jesse_Dillon   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:31 AM]
Well your the one that talks about being "perportionable" and that ISNT.
david18   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:35 AM]
I talk about being pROportionable. And Mollie IS proportionate. This is an example of optical illusion. The waistband of the undies and the shadows around her breast distort their size. And if you believe not, go to her Elite page, or her Storm models page. She's listed as 33-24-34. That's pretty proportionate. Unlike certain plus-sized models who's measurements (not to mention, portfolio) have not changed an inch despite her pear-ness difference with WHOPPING seven inches.
Jesse_Dillon   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:43 AM]
Well it doesnt look proportional to me..... looks like she needs a burger
david18   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:46 AM]
I would expect nothing more out of a comment of your's. This body is FIT, jesse. You don't get tone like that from starving yourself. But, fine. I know a million women who would rather look disgusting, then.
Jesse_Dillon   [Jan 27, 2009 at 02:40 AM]
Im jk, but to me she either needs to loose the hips, or get some wieght on her ribs, bc THAT is NOT proportionate.
david18   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:02 PM]
Like I said before, jesse, this is proportionate. The shadows and lines make it SEEM distorted. THESE are curves, unlike whitney's boxy pear-figure.
RunFiercely   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:16 PM]
I'm sorry, I'm just rolling on the floor laughing at her body being called curvy.
david18   [Jan 27, 2009 at 12:18 PM]
I don't see a straight figure, rf. How are those not curves. There is a curve from her breasts to her hips. As in her body is not a straight line.

Comment 1 to 20 of 35
Page: 1 - 2