All ANTM

Photos of every ANTM contestant!
Home > Cycle 12 > London Levi > Print Work
London Levi
Photo: Michael J. Laudini
For: Playboy, October 2009

London Levi

Photo: Michael J. Laudini
For: Playboy, October 2009

[Playboy]_London01_(Michael_J__Laudini).jpg

Comment 97 to 116 of 236
Page: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12

5671089   [Sep 15, 2009 at 07:08 PM]
every one is making a big deal that she showed her breast! but like half of the top model girls show their breast! lol! even marjorie! and she was the "shy" one! I think London is gorgeous but yeah i do agree with the fact that i don't want her to have her career based on playboy! I wish she would get choosen by an agency! but not with this picture! lol! Smile i think i would have been more surprised if this was shannon! it would have been awesome if it was allison! lol Smile every one says this looks cheap but what photo on playboy look classy? lol!

btw i am not offended! but i am surprised!
i really thought this was a pre show picture Rolling Eyes

HOW MUCH DO YOU GUYS THINK SHE GOT PAYED???
I REALLY WOULD LIKE TO KNOW!
  [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:00 PM]
When the other models show their breasts, it's for artistic photography. This is just porn.
Milly   [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:00 PM]
EW
Tacita   [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:05 PM]
I don't hate it, but I reaaaally dont want to see Thalia doing something like this.
antmchocholate   [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:16 PM]
T_T Im pissed it wasnt someone more attractive.London is one of the last people I would think to do a playboy ad.Im disapointed London v_v
KappaHattori   [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:27 PM]
Karasu19. This girl was featured prominently displaying her love for Jesus. All of the time. Iffff this girl was as devout a Christian as she made it seem, then she would act in the manner of a Christian. And just so you know, pornography is not the typical Christian thing to do. And just to summarize, in case you didn't read, which might be difficult for you (judging by your poor grammatical syntax and lack of punctuation), the last sentence of my previous paragraph said I will not hate her for it. And I actually do believe that the sentences which preceded it gave an explanation of why I will not hate her. But, I think your comment, along with alot of the comments on this picture, were simply people trying to express their disbelief in Christianity, or simply their perverted love of Pornography. But hey.
neerja   [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:33 PM]
OMG..... Surprised
antmchocholate   [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:34 PM]
I felt that ambers love for jesus was a little bit off.Rlly fake.She like came on the topic off the top of her head and she stuck with it.
BertRicho   [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:52 PM]
I dont see anything wrong with this photo. i didn't even read who it was for. Playboy or not its a stunning photo, and i think all of the people who are belittleing this photo are because she is a street preacher. last time i checked that doesn't make much, or any, money. I did not find this mens maggy at all, is she had a bra on it could be an add for underwear. TBH it think people should stop being so snooty when these pics pop up.
lucks   [Sep 15, 2009 at 08:57 PM]
Did God ask her to do this? lol
duds   [Sep 15, 2009 at 09:42 PM]
Mycatjewel maybe for you, but i only can think on her "praying" about jesus christ and the lord and some teenage pervert coming up for her and saying "F. jesus, you were hot in playboy!". She should give an example i guess, see i'm not against her going out on playboy, but i'm thinking where it will be her credibility when she'll preach on streets... maybe i'm being too radical but it was only something that i thought that maybe never happen, but there's also the possibility of no one listens to her because of that. But she's gorgeous in this pic.
highfashionjunkie   [Sep 15, 2009 at 10:14 PM]
okay, i am confused as to why people are saying this is no big deal. people are saying, big deal, she showed a breast & this is true because probably 3/4 of models do photoshoots with their breasts showing. HOWEVER they do it for fashion magazines NOT PLAYBOY in which men look at for the purpose of getting off not just to comment on how well the girl models.
Eat-Your-HeartOut-Tyra   [Sep 15, 2009 at 10:20 PM]
This is pretty tasteful, her modeling sucks IMO but the shot itself doesn't look cheap. If anything is making it look cheap, it's her.
Northernstangl   [Sep 15, 2009 at 10:38 PM]
This is pretty ironic. Neutral I don't think this is a bad, cheap, or even pornographic photo. She look better with that hair, but not as high fashion as on the show.
  [Sep 15, 2009 at 11:00 PM]
I actually think this is gorgeous, I'm just not crazy about how her hair looks.
Morrie   [Sep 15, 2009 at 11:31 PM]
Yeah, the world's gonna end because a Christian posed topless. Rolling Eyes I can't believe some people. And it's a good shot, at that. London has nice boobs. XD
danny_20001   [Sep 16, 2009 at 03:48 AM]
oh my! lol. i never expected London to be in Playboy. Shocked
Okoda   [Sep 16, 2009 at 03:54 AM]
I don't like this nude shoot! Confused
FinlandBoy   [Sep 16, 2009 at 06:56 AM]
I Love The Tits! Hate The Hair! Love London!<3
Costaricafashion   [Sep 16, 2009 at 07:27 AM]
IT'S BEEN SAID THAT THIS IS PRESHOW AND THE PHOTOGRAPHER SIMPLY HANDED THIS PICTURE TO PLAYBOY

Comment 97 to 116 of 236
Page: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12