Why has this got a 1.6? It's much better than that! I wish everyone would stop hating and give each photo what it deserves. Even if I hate the girl I still give an honest rating.
^Yahh thats never gonna happen, her cover girl shot is rated lower than FATIMAS. People prolly vote 0 on every one of her pics even if it is good. THIS however, "I" wouldnt even give a 2. But people need to grow up, these are the only terrible pics in her alboum, there is [5] of them, and people act liek she has the worst shots ever. Its 5 pictures people get a LIFE. Better than standing in front of a FAST FOOD resteraunt!
1) i wouldn't give this anymore than a 2. the body looks good, but the face is blank.
2) certain people act like almost all her photos are genius.
3) the boston globe is not a fashion magazine. so WHY THE HELL would they get a fashion forward location??!! it was an INTERVIEW. and only a few of those photos were at the restaurant. boston globe isn't vogue, you know.
no, but they include an EDITORIAL SPREAD along with the interview, where her wardrobe and setting was provided for her. fatima's was solely an interview with photos of the interviewed. not an EDITORIAL SPREAD. and jacksonville is LIFESTYLE magazine, and most lifestyle magazines include a fashion section.
and they did! ONLY ONE SHOT WAS AT MCDONALD'S! THE REST WERE ALL OVER THE TOWN! besides, i could say the same thing for whitney's my life sequences. they could've shown her walking in an actual runway show rather then stomping across new york like an idiot.
Yahh but then you would look silly, bc they arent "My life as a runway model" . It was to advertise make-up. . Are you sure there is only one at Mcdonalds? ima go look
Tons of girls stomp around New York City like idiots. I'm there a few times a month and let me tell you guys, Whitney's not the only one. But the thing is, as much as I deplore Fatima, who cares if she took one shot in front of McDonald's? Whitney was probably stomping through Manhattan like an idiot just to get to a McDonald's.
2) certain people act like almost all her photos are genius.
3) the boston globe is not a fashion magazine. so WHY THE HELL would they get a fashion forward location??!! it was an INTERVIEW. and only a few of those photos were at the restaurant. boston globe isn't vogue, you know.