All ANTM

Photos of every ANTM contestant!
Home > Cycle 1 > Adrianne Curry > Print Work
Adrianne Curry
For: Playboy, February 2006

Adrianne Curry

For: Playboy, February 2006

[Playboy]_Adrianne11.jpg [Playboy]_Adrianne12.jpg [Playboy]_Adrianne13.jpg [Playboy]_Adrianne14.jpg [Playboy]_Adrianne15.jpg

Comment 1 to 20 of 50
Page: 1 - 2 - 3

Rizka   [Jun 19, 2008 at 05:17 AM]
So... she wears nothing but those little crystals and high heels?
dark.angel   [Jan 16, 2009 at 09:29 PM]
Playboy. Figures. I assume she'd say this is ART! Pssshhh
Mycatjewel   [Jan 16, 2009 at 09:34 PM]
I know some people think the sight of pubic hair is gross, but to me a waxed groin is disgusting! And I think her breasts look strange here. Too bad her Playboy is nothing like Lily Cole's French Playboy, that was at least beautiful instead of repulsive.
curdledsauce   [Feb 04, 2009 at 06:16 AM]
What exactly is wrong about this? I do agree that the boobs look somewhat strange.
Mycatjewel   [Feb 04, 2009 at 05:48 PM]
Ugghh...I think a grown woman with no pubic hair is so repulsive! Sadly some of my favorite models are waxed there too (Oh Lara Stone...) but just uggghhh...its sickening!
SAPPHiiRE.xo   [Feb 04, 2009 at 05:50 PM]
i hate adrianne shes ugly aswell as a bad model.
curdledsauce   [Feb 04, 2009 at 09:41 PM]
She has some pubic hair here, it's just trimmed. And it's their preference however they want their pubic area to look like.
Michelle&AmandaBabin   [Feb 04, 2009 at 10:00 PM]
I don't get why people bash her so much, I mean really. Playboy may not be Haute Couture or Vogue, but its work either way, and in the end of the day, it pays. I don't blame her either, though I don't see how this is "getting back at Tyra".
sam'sboyfriend   [Feb 04, 2009 at 10:01 PM]
I think Playboy is tasteful nude it is not porn
curdledsauce   [Feb 04, 2009 at 10:01 PM]
@Michelle&AmandaBabin: Some people just think being nude is the worst thing ever.
Michelle&AmandaBabin   [Feb 04, 2009 at 10:05 PM]
@curdled, I don't get that either. I mean there's nudity in the fashion world as well, and I, for one, believe that nudity isn't such a bad thing. I don't see anything wrong with it.
sam'sboyfriend   [Feb 04, 2009 at 10:06 PM]
I love girls nude personally
Mycatjewel   [Feb 05, 2009 at 03:18 PM]
Playboy is not artistic, it is tacky. And it offends me as an artist to hear people label anything as art! From Lauren's Fuerza Bruta to Adrianna's Playboy spreads.
Jesse_Dillon   [Feb 05, 2009 at 03:31 PM]
There is NOTHING artistic about playboy.
Michelle&AmandaBabin   [Feb 05, 2009 at 06:51 PM]
Whoa... Deja Vu... Anyway, I don't think its artistic, but at the same time, I wouldn't say its trashy either.
Mycatjewel   [Feb 05, 2009 at 08:09 PM]
^ When a woman is standing over a motorcylce rubbing her nipples I have a hard time finding artistic merit. A wise person on deviantart once made a very smart stamp reading "Pornography is NOT nude art" And I consider these men's magazines bordering on the edge of porn. I'm just happy Lily Cole's French Playboy spread was not like this. And if you want ACTUAL nude art look at Manet's "Olympia".
starburst.   [Feb 05, 2009 at 08:55 PM]
I agree; at least it's Playboy and not something like Hustler. Also, Mycat, I am also an artist, and in no way do I see this as "trashy". Though I don't really like to look at nakey people, this is sort of like a modern day version of Olympia, only much, MUCH more modernized. Besides, if people want to label things as art, then so what? It may not be art to you, but from their POV, it is.
Jesse_Dillon   [Feb 05, 2009 at 09:15 PM]
I think its extremly trashy. Especially for sumone who could actualyl be a fashion model. Not a cooter model
curdledsauce   [Feb 05, 2009 at 10:06 PM]
Art is subjective. There is no universality to what defines art. If someone considers something a piece of art, why fuss? And for the love of God, good models have posed for Playboy. Like Claudia Schiffer and Cindy Crawford.
sam'sboyfriend   [Feb 05, 2009 at 10:08 PM]
Who said it was art

Comment 1 to 20 of 50
Page: 1 - 2 - 3