^^^ agreed. they did the same thing they did to Kelle and Ann from Cycle 3, kept them around for way, WAY too long to take a good photo and when they finally produced one they booted them because of the risk of "falling back" on what they did before. i think the judges should do a three strike system, three appearances in the bottom two gets you the boot on the third time and if there is a bottom two who both were making their third appearance in the bottom two they should boot them both.
steagle: that's what i was thinking on this season's eliminations. Amis 2 times in the bottom 2 OUT! Claire 2 times in the bottom 2 OUT! but that theory went tits up after Whitney's appearances.
her portfolio had maybe 2 good shots including this one and she was boring as hell, while melrose won most of the challenges, had consistently great shots, a great walk, and tons of drive.........I wonder who deserved to stay
Jenah would be eliminated by the three strikes system by default. there should be a personality exception where strikes only count if you actually deserve to be in the bottom two.
[May 24, 2008 at 09:49 PM]
Nice, but there's something strange about this picture...
well i think she should have been part of the final 2 with melrose. her matador picture is so incredibly amazing im sill amazed everytime i see it. plus she has been the most succesful from her cycle so i bet eugena doesnt care what you haters have to say about her and her placement in the competition because she is beating out all of her cycle in the real life competition