Regardless of how many photos, it IS her career, therefore, should be posted in this gallery that FOLLOWS the careers of the models. And OF COURSE online is print work. When Kate Moss is featured on Versace's website, she gets paid for it. It IS a job. If someone's tired of seeing these Kimberly's print work, stop going to her portfolio. Geez. Never thought I'd see the day someone would be mad at a contestant getting work.

its just obnoxious to try and see the stuff before kimberly because you have to go back about 2098309283083 pages of the same stuff over and over just to get back to see other new stuff

Forgive Kimberly for being obnoxious by trying to make a living. She's so SELFISH!

you know what? I would like to see MORE kimberly pictures!

It's not Kimberly that I find obnoxious, it's having a million shots of her that I have to wade through that I find obnoxious. I'm glad she's getting work, unlike a lot of the other models. I just think it's overkill to have so many shots of the same outfit. I don't think that's being unreasonable.

I dont think that its Kimberlys fault at all that the designers chose many shots of the same outfit, to be honest.

i think that its great that kim is working... i just wish there was a little more variety and quality in the work that she was doing. i mean i think she can do way better than ebay stores...

That's what catalogue is about. SHOWING THE CLOTHES. Not all catalogues do it, but there are some. And if you ever go on a store's website, you may notice the link for MULTIPLE VIEWS of the garment where it shows the front, back, side, etc. Doesn't anyone understand catalogue?

@redsox: True. But you got to start somewhere. And think of it like this: If she works her ass off, by the time the sixth set of photos for these stores come out, she should be getting many more frames that have great face and pose, and she'll knock us dead at an actual photoshoot to advertise Kimberly as a model. Plus, she said she may head to New York soon.

I agree with David. At the end of the day, she's getting work, and she's getting paid. And honestly, I don't think her posing isn't as bad as people make it out to be. <alex perry>She makes the clothes look expensive. </alex perry>

YAY! Two non-haters! Plus, these clothes don't look nearly as bad on her as they would on other girls from her cycle. Atalya? Lauren? Dominique? whitney?

I think its great to see lots of shots of her. At least she is doing SOMETHING! Especially they are print work too. She is also adorable and maybe in the long run, she COULD be the new Gemma Ward.

Do I like Kimberly, not really, do I hate her, absolutely not.

@ KappaHattori : Well, at least 1 person sat there and went through every single picture... since I raided each eBay auction to save the photos. I've seen all of them.

@ irritablevowel : Perhaps not necessary... but I like having as much of their work on the gallery as I possibly can. I hoard photos... and having an incomplete hoard makes me slowly insane. But like david18 said, online stuff is definitely still print work.

@ bigdmarie08 : You will!

I love Kim to pieces! Apparently she visits the store I work at but I've missed her!

before you criticize her, imagine how much she must have been paid for all of the print work. catalgue pays much better than a vogue editorial so she must be working it

Not so sure about a Vogue editorial, but catalogue sure pays well.

I always wanted to know how much Tocarra made from her Vogue Italia deal. That was a pretty big deal. Does anyone know or have any rough idea

she didnt really make alot of money crisp srrry 2 tell u, but she took beautiful pix and boosted her carrer, probaly lyk roughly 1,000-1,500

Really is that it. I guess the experience is worth a million (well maybe not a million) times the money.

You have to remember that a shoot like this would be booked at a day rate. I doubt she has a very high day rate and I bet there was another outfit every three minutes. Change, shoot. Change, shoot. Two days, $300, 1 billion blah photos.