What makes this different from an "artisic" nudity shot, or any other nude shot for that matter? Cuz she's not covering her boobs? Grow up. The fact that this is a PlayBoy shot is irrelevant.
This is a great photo for what it's supposed to be for, but I would never have expected this out of London. It's so incongruent with her personality on the show, where she seemed so self-conscious over her body that she would never show it off like this... Even if the photographer's a douche-bag, I'm surprised London agreed to pose nude in the first place given her insecurities.
guys london is a STREET PREACHER! thats true devotion! she wouldnt just get caught up in the modeling world and do this for no reason. there IS a reason, we just dont know it
i have this issue of playboy and this shot is in the back of the magazine in a section of the mag called "the grapevine" which is mostly just pics of famous people accidentally giving a nip slip or somethiing lol
people need to stop freaking out as if you're a saint, I think those people's attitude are more disgusting than her posing for playboy, the hypocrisy ..
Cheap... Nude photos can be really artistic indeed... But this not at all artistic... Even though i like her, this is not good at all =P Sorry London...
Since the show, London appeared in Playboy Magazine in October, 2009. She did not personally pose for the men’s publication; the photographer who took the photos two years prior sent them to Playboy without her knowledge
I'm not sure what you guys were expecting... "Artistic nudity" "creative" it's PLAYBOY for gods sake, It's appealing to men who want to see this sort of thing, If you want "artistic nudity" go somewhere else. And I will go with you