All ANTM

Photos of every ANTM contestant!
Home > Cycle 12 > London Levi > Print Work
London Levi
Photo: Michael J. Laudini
For: Playboy, October 2009

London Levi

Photo: Michael J. Laudini
For: Playboy, October 2009

[Playboy]_London01_(Michael_J__Laudini).jpg

Comment 217 to 236 of 236
Page: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12

JordyLuvsANTM   [Jan 21, 2010 at 06:05 PM]
What on earth? Shocked Did she do this for JESUS?! Laughing
Soren   [Feb 18, 2010 at 12:01 AM]
THIS IS NOT PORNO! She looks great. Smile
yoyo621   [Mar 02, 2010 at 10:30 AM]
Shocked crazy...
homan6464   [Mar 29, 2010 at 08:08 AM]
Why ... Question Crying or Very sad
thegayangel   [Mar 29, 2010 at 10:18 AM]
Shocked nude is ok but this look cheap Shocked
GissenFo   [Apr 10, 2010 at 11:35 PM]
Rolling Eyes i can't understand this ....why???????it's not so match with her Rolling Eyes
Dharren   [May 15, 2010 at 11:26 AM]
What makes this different from an "artisic" nudity shot, or any other nude shot for that matter? Cuz she's not covering her boobs? Grow up. The fact that this is a PlayBoy shot is irrelevant.
HARDROCKER   [May 15, 2010 at 09:40 PM]
I thought she was a devotly christian!
Mirlina   [May 27, 2010 at 09:37 PM]
I guess this is one of her way to spread the joy? By showing people how great God creates body and how body can give you love? Shocked
finalz101   [Jun 23, 2010 at 11:46 AM]
She said that this wasn't supossed to be for playboy the photographer photographed her nude and sold it to playboy Sad
shiru   [Jun 23, 2010 at 09:56 PM]
This is a great photo for what it's supposed to be for, but I would never have expected this out of London. It's so incongruent with her personality on the show, where she seemed so self-conscious over her body that she would never show it off like this... Even if the photographer's a douche-bag, I'm surprised London agreed to pose nude in the first place given her insecurities.
spike78127   [Jul 02, 2010 at 09:19 PM]
guys london is a STREET PREACHER! thats true devotion! she wouldnt just get caught up in the modeling world and do this for no reason. there IS a reason, we just dont know it Wink
RealityTVking   [Jul 17, 2010 at 12:55 PM]
i have this issue of playboy and this shot is in the back of the magazine in a section of the mag called "the grapevine" which is mostly just pics of famous people accidentally giving a nip slip or somethiing lol
randyprawita   [Aug 07, 2010 at 10:25 PM]
how tall london actually? she's always look short in every picture
swedishorient   [Aug 25, 2010 at 03:18 AM]
people need to stop freaking out as if you're a saint, I think those people's attitude are more disgusting than her posing for playboy, the hypocrisy ..
Bellhop36   [Oct 03, 2010 at 12:54 AM]
What I like about this is even though she is showing her boob, you are still looking at her face
akaksisters   [Oct 18, 2010 at 04:51 AM]
Cheap... Nude photos can be really artistic indeed... But this not at all artistic... Even though i like her, this is not good at all =P Sorry London...
sncanton   [Oct 25, 2010 at 10:23 AM]
i agree i think this looks cheap ..not creative or even exciting
DaniEvansFan21   [Jun 27, 2011 at 11:38 AM]
Since the show, London appeared in Playboy Magazine in October, 2009. She did not personally pose for the men’s publication; the photographer who took the photos two years prior sent them to Playboy without her knowledge
Canadagirl1234   [Nov 27, 2013 at 05:03 PM]
I'm not sure what you guys were expecting... "Artistic nudity" "creative" it's PLAYBOY for gods sake, It's appealing to men who want to see this sort of thing, If you want "artistic nudity" go somewhere else. And I will go with you Confused

Comment 217 to 236 of 236
Page: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12